Daptomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium
% Resistant in 2024
11.3% Resistant
Number of Resistant Isolates of the Total Number of Isolates Tested In 2024
253 Resistant
/ 2,241 Tested
% Resistant by Patient Age in 2024
- Pediatric:
- 14.3% Resistant
- Adult:
- 11.2% Resistant
Pathogen Profile
Daptomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium
Enterococci cause a range of illnesses, mostly among patients receiving healthcare, including bloodstream infections, surgical site infections, and urinary tract infections. E. faecium can be resistant to many antibiotics, including daptomycin. Such resistance makes treatment of these infections more difficult.
- Data Source
- National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)
- Current Threat Report
Threat LevelNot Currently Rated
Source: COVID-19: U.S. Impact on Antimicrobial Resistance, Special Report 2024
- Years Included
- 2011 - 2024
Geographic Locations
Percent Daptomycin resistance Among E. faecium by State Map
Percent Daptomycin resistance Among E. faecium by State
| Location | value |
|---|---|
| Alabama | 5.9 |
| Alaska | Insufficient Data |
| Arizona | 4.3 |
| Arkansas | 6.9 |
| California | 10.8 |
| Colorado | 57.7 |
| Connecticut | 5.3 |
| Delaware | Insufficient Data |
| District of Columbia | Insufficient Data |
| Florida | 9.4 |
| Georgia | 7.5 |
| Hawaii | Insufficient Data |
| Idaho | Insufficient Data |
| Illinois | 15 |
| Indiana | 25 |
| Iowa | Insufficient Data |
| Kansas | Insufficient Data |
| Kentucky | 13.9 |
| Louisiana | Insufficient Data |
| Maine | Insufficient Data |
| Maryland | 23.8 |
| Massachusetts | 3.8 |
| Michigan | 5.4 |
| Minnesota | 3.4 |
| Mississippi | Insufficient Data |
| Missouri | 5.9 |
| Montana | Insufficient Data |
| Nebraska | Insufficient Data |
| Nevada | 9.5 |
| New Hampshire | Insufficient Data |
| New Jersey | 2.2 |
| New Mexico | Insufficient Data |
| New York | 15.4 |
| North Carolina | 34 |
| North Dakota | Insufficient Data |
| Ohio | 9.6 |
| Oklahoma | 14.7 |
| Oregon | Insufficient Data |
| Pennsylvania | 6.7 |
| Puerto Rico | Insufficient Data |
| Rhode Island | Insufficient Data |
| South Carolina | 15 |
| South Dakota | Insufficient Data |
| Tennessee | 17.1 |
| Texas | 20.3 |
| Utah | Insufficient Data |
| Vermont | Insufficient Data |
| Virginia | 3.8 |
| Washington | 0 |
| West Virginia | Insufficient Data |
| Wisconsin | 16.3 |
| Wyoming | Insufficient Data |
Percent Daptomycin resistance Among E. faecium by State List
Geography
| state | value |
|---|---|
| United States | 11.3% |
| Alabama | 5.9% |
| Alaska | No Data |
| Arizona | 4.3% |
| Arkansas | 6.9% |
| California | 10.8% |
| Colorado | 57.7% |
| Connecticut | 5.3% |
| Delaware | No Data |
| District of Columbia | No Data |
Changes Over Time in Daptomycin resistance Among E. faecium
This graph displays percent antimicrobial resistance from 2011 to 2024 for all event types. Blank areas of the chart represent 0% resistance, indicating that zero resistant pathogens were reported for the selected year, phenotype, and HAI type. “Insufficient data” indicates that less than 20 pathogens were isolated and tested for resistance.
Due to definition changes, caution should be used when reviewing this phenotype over time.
| Year | % Resistant |
|---|---|
| 2011 | 5.5 |
| 2012 | 5.3 |
| 2013 | 5.8 |
| 2014 | 7.7 |
| 2015 | 5.1 |
| 2016 | 4.2 |
| 2017 | 5 |
| 2018 | 4.4 |
| 2019 | 5 |
| 2020 | 5.5 |
| 2021 | 6.5 |
| 2022 | 8.9 |
| 2023 | 11.8 |
| 2024 | 11.3 |
Healthcare Facility Type
Daptomycin resistance Among E. faecium by Hospital Type
Percent resistant Among E. faecium by Hospital Type
| Hospital Type | % Resistant |
|---|---|
| General Acute Care Hospitals | 11.2 |
| Long Term Acute Care Hospitals | 14.8 |
Footnotes
- HAIs include Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI), Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI), and Surgical Site Infections (SSI).
- CI (Confidence Interval) - The national, regional, and state-level data included in Antimicrobial Resistance information are displayed with 95% confidence intervals around the percent resistance, which were calculated using a mid-P exact test and are an indication of precision.
- Map legends are classified using the Jenks Natural Breaks method.
- The definition for this phenotype underwent changes in 2021. For more information, refer to the AR&PSP Phenotype Definitions.